|
|
|
|
|
|
Witnessing to Disciples of the International
Churches of Christ
(a.k.a.
the Boston Movement)
by Joanne Ruhland
Initially, members of the International Churches of Christ (ICC; also known as
the Boston movement, the Boston Church of Christ, etc.) might resemble
Christians who are excited about serving the Lord. They sound evangelical and
they claim the Bible is their only source for doctrine. Such similarities are
superficial. ICC disciples (their terminology) are members of one of the
fastest growing heretical movements in the world.
Why classify this seemingly Bible-based organization as heretical? To
warrant this designation, a sect must deny one or more of the cardinal tenets
of the historic Christian faith. Among ICC’s doctrinal deviations are a
works-oriented plan of salvation that is related to a faulty understanding of
grace and the rejection of the doctrine of original sin.1
A Faulty View of Grace. While purporting to believe in salvation by
grace through faith (Eph. 2:8-9) in Jesus Christ,2 in actuality,
certain sequential acts3 have been added as prerequisites for
salvation. One must become a disciple, which by ICC definition includes
changing one’s lifestyle to conform with the movement’s standards for
Christians, and be baptized. With these additions ICC departs from the gospel
of grace, which is the sufficiency of the redemptive work of Jesus Christ for
all who believe (1 Cor. 15:1-4, John 3:16, Eph. 2:8-9), and enters the realm of
the cults.4
Kip McKean, the leader of the movement, explains ICC’s beliefs regarding
salvation: "When you preach who is really saved: that you gotta have
faith, you gotta repent, you gotta become a true disciple of Jesus, and
then you gotta be water immersed for the forgiveness of sins received through
the Holy Spirit, that excludes all other denominations . . . everybody else
that’s out there."5 The first two requirements are orthodox.
The latter two, as conditions of salvation rather than as results
of it, are works.
ICC’s aberration from orthodoxy in its distinctive doctrine of salvation is
emphasized by Nick Young, lead evangelist for the ICC congregation in
Dallas-Ft. Worth:
Once you become a disciple, then
you can be baptized, but you cannot be baptized until you become a disciple.
And that’s where, as far as I know, the rest of the entire religious world got
it all messed up. I don’t know of any religious group in this world that
teaches you gotta be a disciple to be baptized, and yet that is what Jesus said
two thousand years ago. And it’s as clear as any verse in the Bible. That’s as
clear as John 3:16. That’s as clear as Acts 2:38. That’s as clear as any verse
you’re gonna read, and yet I don’t know of any other religious group that
teaches you gotta be a totally committed disciple (emphasis
added) of Jesus to get baptized into Christ.6
To become a disciple, the prospective convert must complete some or all of a
series of studies with one or more ICC members,7 agree to attend all
services,8 promise to read the Bible daily,9 begin
recruiting others,10 agree to obey the church leaders,11
and give tithes weekly.12 Also, the individual must list all the
sins he or she has ever committed,13 confess these sins to one or
more members,14 and be "cut to the heart" by the severity
of Christ’s death on the cross as atonement for our sins.15
After meeting all prerequisites, the prospective member’s eligibility for
salvation then depends on the leadership determining if the candidate is ready
for baptism. Ultimately then, receiving God’s grace in ICC depends on faith
plus the completion of works, the presumptuousness of the leaders judging
another’s heart, and water baptism.
Other problematic areas in ICC include inadequate views of the perfection of
God and Christ,16 exclusivity,17 an unbiblical form of
authority,18 and elevation of certain historical biblical
occurrences to the level of normative doctrine (e.g., "one church to one
city," based on universalizing Rev. 2-3).19
Preparing to Witness. In principle, preparation for witnessing to
disciples is similar to the preparation necessary for reaching members of other
cults. Besides knowing their doctrinal errors, it is valuable to understand
their world view, methodology, terminology, and the degree to which the
individual understands and follows the movement’s teachings.
Inherent in disciples’ thinking is the belief that theirs is the only true
church and the movement of God.20 Any criticism of ICC
is viewed as persecution. As do members of other cults, ICC disciples interpret
this so-called "persecution" as proving theirs is God’s true church.
Most members fervently believe there is no valid reason to leave their church.
Leaving it would be tantamount to forsaking God.21 They readily
dismiss doctrinal and leadership errors with this rationale: "We don’t say
we can’t make mistakes. If we make one, we admit it and correct it."22
Obviously then, trust in ICC as the movement of God becomes a powerful
obstacle to the disciples’ believing anyone who would present material contrary
to the group’s teachings.
Beginning the Dialogue. Fortunately, the desire to know and serve God
and a commitment to the Bible as the Word of God provide a foundation for
dialogue. An effective witnessing approach incorporates affirming the
disciple’s zeal for God with proving that ICC is not the true church by
demonstrating it promotes a false gospel – salvation based on works.
Establishing an agreement on the criteria for evaluating the gospel ICC
promotes is the next step in exposing the works-based gospel of this movement.
A conversation might begin something like this:
Christian: I understand
your church teaches that it alone is the movement of God.
Disciple: We believe we’re
following God. We only teach what the Bible teaches. There may be others out
there who have come to the truth that only baptized disciples are saved. If
they are really good-hearted, they will want to be with true disciples.23
Christian: Do you believe
a Christian church must present the gospel without adding or subtracting
anything from it?
Disciple: Yes. That’s what
we do!
Christian: Would you
examine the gospel with me?
Disciple: Sure. I’d be
glad to study the Bible with you. Why don’t we meet tonight at your
house? I’d like to bring a friend too.
Christian: That sounds
fine, except I prefer not to meet with anyone else yet. Maybe another time.
Disciple: I’ll see you
tonight!
Certain comments made by the disciple should be noted. "Study the
Bible" is another way of saying "I’ll use our ‘Bible’ studies."
The disciple might attempt to introduce a segment from their proselytizing
studies, First Principles. The "Discipleship" segment is
skillfully designed to lead the potential convert to one conclusion – he (or
she) is not a Christian! Unless the Christian is careful, he could lose control
of the conversation. "I’d like to bring a friend," is an attempt to
establish a numerical advantage.
The Second Meeting: How Can You Baptize a Nation? Essential to this
movement’s existence is its teaching concerning discipleship and making
disciples. Matthew 28:18-20 is the primary passage cited as proof that Jesus
established an unchangeable order of steps required for salvation:24
"Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the
name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to
obey everything I have commanded you...."25 The ICC teaches
that the first step indicated in this passage is to become a disciple (according
to their definition); the second is baptism. Only baptized disciples are
saved.
To demonstrate the untenableness of this interpretation, it is important to
have several reference works available: an NIV Bible (ICC’s preferred version),
an exhaustive concordance, and an expository dictionary of New Testament words
(e.g., Vine’s). Spatial constraints limit this discussion to the disciple
aspect of their salvation formula.
The following conversation demonstrates an approach to refuting one of their
departures from this gospel of grace – becoming a disciple as a prerequisite to
salvation.
Christian: Christian appears
three times in the New Testament, and disciple occurs more than
250 times. To whom does disciple refer?
Disciple: Christians.
Disciples were first called Christians in Antioch (Acts 11:26-27).
Christian: Doesn’t your
church teach "disciple=Christian=saved?"26
Disciple: That’s what the
Bible teaches.
Christian: If disciple,
Christian, and saved are synonymous, they can be used
interchangeably27 for disciples in Matthew 28:19-20:
"Therefore go and make Christians of all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and
teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. . . . " (or)
"Therefore go and make saved of all nations, baptizing
them...." With these substitutions applied, is Jesus actually commanding a
person to be a baptized disciple to be saved?
Disciple: Well, maybe not,
but Jesus commanded us to be disciples to be saved.
Christian: Let’s study
this further. Who’s speaking in this passage?
Disciple: Jesus.
Christian: Do you believe
Jesus, God the Son, could make a mistake when he spoke?
Disciple: No.
Christian: Can we agree
Matthew was inspired by the Holy Spirit, and the Bible is inerrant?
Disciple: Yes.
Christian: Then, if Jesus
wanted to convey a different meaning, this passage would be worded differently.
In verse 19, he says to baptize "them." Them is a
pronoun. In Greek and English, a pronoun must refer to a noun, not a verb. In
Greek, make disciples is a verb. (Have the member look up this
form of disciple in an expository dictionary.) Thus, the pronoun, them,
must refer to the noun, nations. According to this grammatical
rule, we must conclude Jesus cannot be teaching that a person must be a
disciple before he is baptized or saved.
Disciple: But if them
refers to nations, how can you baptize a nation?
Christian: Baptizing a
whole nation would be tough. However, baptizing and teaching are
participles. As participles, they must refer to the verb, make
disciples. These participles describe how a disciple is made, by being
baptized and taught. They are not commands that you must do certain things to
be a disciple, and then be baptized to be saved. To make disciples, and then
baptize them, is not what Jesus commanded.
Disciple: What about the
nations?
Christian: The Greek word
for nations is ethnos. (Have the disciple locate nation in
an expository dictionary.) And to whom is Jesus speaking?
Disciple: The disciples.
Christian: Right. Of what
race were they?
Disciples: They were
Hebrews.
Christian: Exactly. Did
they believe the Messiah was to come for the Jews, or for the whole world?
Disciple: They believed
Jesus came for the Jews.
Christian: What new
teaching was Jesus conveying to the disciples?
Disciple: Oh, I see. They
were to begin preaching to all people, not just to the Jews.
Christian: Yes. Before
Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection, his followers did not preach the gospel
to other ethnic groups. Afterward, Jesus commanded them to go to all nations.
Did you need to know Greek to study as we just did?
Disciple: No.
Christian: Could there be
any reason your leaders, some of whom have seminary training, or anyone else,
could not study this passage just as you have?
Disciple: No.
Christian: Your leaders
assert they have "rediscovered" a so-called lost biblical doctrine
that actually never existed. Instead, they added to the passage, and included
the work of being a disciple as a requirement for salvation. Would you read
Proverbs 30:5-6 with me? ("Every word of God is flawless; . . . Do not add
to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.") Now, let’s
read what Paul wrote in Galatians 1:8-9. ("But even if we or an angel from
heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be
eternally condemned!") Would these warnings apply to ICC’s
misinterpretation of Matthew 28:18-20?
Disciple: Well, uh, I
don’t know.
Christian: If ICC were
really God’s true church, it would not promote this false gospel.
Disciple: Maybe we made a
mistake here. We don’t claim to be perfect. But Jesus still said we have
to be His disciples, so what difference does it make?
Christian: You are right.
We are to be his disciples. Disciple is another word for follower, and all
people who know Christ as Savior are His followers. But to live as a disciple
before being saved is not something we can do, nor would Jesus require us to do
so. In fact, we cannot live the regenerate life of a disciple until after
salvation, when the Holy Spirit indwells and empowers us, and changes us from
within. To expect people to change and live a godly life by themselves, instead
of by the power of God, is expecting the impossible. Adding requirements to the
gospel of salvation makes a mockery of His grace.
Disciple: Okay, I
understand. This may be wrong. But can you show me any other examples of where
we’re not following the Bible?
Next, the discussion should explore ICC’s other works-oriented teachings on
salvation contrasted with salvation by grace, as well as the movement’s denial
of man’s sin nature, its unscriptural views on authority, and the belief that
Revelation 2-3 commands only one church to each city.
Challenges Faced after Leaving ICC. Do not underestimate the dynamics
of this movement. Sadly, numerous stories exist of successful witnessing
efforts with ICC disciples that within 24 hours or less were reversed. How
could someone who realized the movement was not God’s true church, and decided
to leave it, suddenly change his (or her) mind? One frequent cause is the
former member’s vulnerability when he first faces other disciples’ reactions to
his decision to leave. Although he recognizes the movement’s errors, he often
is unable to explain them to his discipler, fellow disciples, or leaders. He
will be subjected to a variety of coercive tactics: "How could you
trust them instead of us? You have let us and God down. We were depending on
you. If you leave, you’re turning your back on God. Bro’, you’ll go to Hell.
Terrible things will happen to you. A dog returns to its vomit. You don’t have
what it takes to be a disciple. You probably were never a Christian in the
first place."
Or, initially, they might take a more subtle approach: "I’m sorry to
hear you feel that way. If we have offended you, give us the opportunity to
reconcile. Proverbs 18:17 says, ‘The first to present his case seems right,
till another comes forward and questions him.’ Would you give _______ [a
leader’s name] an opportunity to respond to what you’ve heard?"
If the new former member agrees to this, he usually will find his meeting
with one leader turns out to be a session with three or more leaders. Their
agenda is not to address doctrinal issues, but instead to rebuke him for his
current decision, past sins (which supposedly had been forgiven), and problems
he had while a member. Confused and under immense pressure, the ex-member might
re-embrace ICC.
To prevent this tragedy, the individual should not be alone when confronted
by ICC members. Discuss with him the reasons he chose to leave, study
Galatians, examine the movement’s other problematic doctrines, equip him to
interpret Scripture independently and to defend himself from manipulation.
Encourage him to write a letter of dissociation. Above all, do these things in
love, with patience, gentleness, and respect.
Joanne Ruhland is in countercult ministry, spec-ializing in the
International Churches of Christ. She can be reached c/o Here’s Life,
San Antonio, P.O. Box 12472, San Antonio, TX, 78212.
NOTES
1Gordon Ferguson, Prepared
to Answer (Woburn, MA: Discipleship Publications International, 1995),
204-9.
2Tom Jones, ed., Deep Convictions (Woburn, MA: Discipleship
Publications International, 1993), inside back cover;10 Life Changing
Studies (handout from the Los Angeles Church of Christ, 1995).
3Al Baird, God on His Knees: That’s Discipleship (Boston,
1990, audiotape), side two.
4The late Dr. Walter Martin wrote: "A cult, as I define
it, is any religious group which differs significantly in some one or more
respects as to belief or practice from those religious groups which are regarded
as the normative expressions of religion in our total culture...I may add to
this that a cult might also be defined as a group of people gathered about a
specific person or person’s misinterpretation of the Bible." Kingdom of
the Cults (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 1992), xii, 11.
5Kip McKean, Preach the Word (Woburn, MA: Discipleship
Publications International, August 1995, audiotape #10091), side two.
6Nick Young, Tulsa Reconstruction (n.p., August 1992,
audiotape), side one.
7Kip McKean, Discipleship (n.p., n.d. audiotape), side one.
8Kip McKean, "The Coming of the Kingdom," in First
Principles (Woburn, MA: Discipleship Publications International, n.d.), 11.
9San Antonio Church of Christ Jesus, "The Coming of the
Kingdom," in First Principles (San Antonio, 1995).
10This observation is based on personal conversations with former
ICC members.
11San Antonio Church of Christ, "The Church," in First
Principles (San Antonio, 1995).
12Ibid.
13This observation is
based on personal conversations with former ICC members.
14San Antonio Church of Christ, "The Cross," in First
Principles (San Antonio, 1995).
15Kip McKean, Apollo Theater, New York, 7 November 1993.
16Gordon Ferguson, "Radical Men: Radical Times/Hosea Radical
Love of God." Manila World Missions Leadership Conference, August 1995
(n.p., 1995, audiotape #9102), side two.
17Ferguson, "Radical Men," side two.
18Kip McKean, "Revolution through Restoration II," UpsideDown,
August 1994, 15.
19For additional information, consult "At What Price Success?"
by James Bjornstad. Christian Research Journal, Winter 1993, 24-28,
30-31.
20Kip McKean, "Revolution through Restoration II," 13, 18.
21Based on responses ICC members have given the author.
22Kip McKean (Indianapolis, 17 March 1994), audiotape one, side two.
23Baird, "God on His Knees."
24San Antonio Church of Christ, "Discipleship," in First
Principles (San Antonio, 1995).
25All Scripture references are taken from the NIV.
26As of May 1996, at least one ICC congregation changed this
equation to "baptized disciples = Christians = saved."
27Kip McKean, "Revolution through Restoration," UpsideDown,
August 1992; reprint, L.A. Story, 3 July 1994, 12.
This article first appeared in
the Fall 1996 issue of the Christian Research Journal